#AMD RYZEN MASTER GAME MODE MOD#
#AMD RYZEN MASTER GAME MODE FULL#
#AMD RYZEN MASTER GAME MODE MODS#
#AMD RYZEN MASTER GAME MODE CODE#

#AMD RYZEN MASTER GAME MODE CODE#

We resolved a condition where an unusual FMA3 code sequence could cause a system hang.This can result in higher performance for latency-sensitive applications. We have reduced DRAM latency by approximately 6ns.We expect BIOSes based on this AGESA to start hitting the public in early April, though specific dates will depend on the schedules and QA practices of your motherboard vendor.īIOSes based on this new code will have four important improvements for you We will soon be distributing AGESA point release 1.0.0.4 to our motherboard partners. Motherboard vendors take the baseline capabilities of our AGESA releases and build on that infrastructure to create the files you download and flash. But again, I am not holding breath given how long it took to release an AMD64 version of the ArmA engine.ĮDIT: Here are the Results using the Ultra Preset + all maxed outĪs a brief primer, the AGESA is responsible for initializing AMD x86-64 processors during boot time, acting as something of a “nucleus” for the BIOS updates you receive for your motherboard. Right now, BIS might even get very good assistance from AMD if optimizing towards their new ♚rch as it is also in their own interest. I do think however, that this would be a great opportunity for BIS as the Ryzen ♚rch is brand new, sells fantastic, is already fast in ArmA3 and will stay for many years to come. But realistically, and Dwarden you might forgive me, it took BIS many many years to adopt the ArmA engine to AMD64 and I do not have the feeling they are going to invest even 100 manhours (please proof me wrong!) to optimze towards a specific architecture.

#AMD RYZEN MASTER GAME MODE FULL#

Sounds a lot but is basically 3-4 people working full time for 3 weeks. According to Oxide Games these optimizations that now led to >20% gain on the Ryzen ♚rch took them 400 man hours. For the same money, you'll have a 1600x + G.Skill FlareX 3200MHz CL14 which is probably the sweetspot for the majority of the djotacon I also see the potential that the Ryzen 'ages well' as more and more games will get threaded and or see optimization towards the Ryzen architecture. If you go for 1700x + DDR4 2133MHz you will be disappointed.

Ryzen really likes fast RAM and ArmA3 does also. Definitely, I would go for the 1600x if my budget does not allow a 1700x AND fast RAM. Me for example, I am often running an Skype video conference with old friends on my second screen if we do multiplayer and thats where you really dont have to worry anymore with the big ryzen sys. If I would look for a general purpose rick which needs to perform well under ArmA3 I would probably choose between the upcoming Ryzen 5 1600x with 6c/12T or if the budget allows the 1700x (8c/16T) depending on which other tasks you're running on the sys. My in game settings always are ULTRA preset with maxed out view distance (12,000m) in FHD. HPET was enabled, as I need it for some other stuff I am doing. Beside the YAAB I can definitely report excellent performance and a very smooth game play. The sys was under 'High Performance' windows settings, so core parking should have been disabled in this run (I did not doublecheck).

You can maybe add an extra frame*s^-1 but again, its not making a b/w difference.

#AMD RYZEN MASTER GAME MODE MOD#

I don't think that the CBA_A3 Mod has much of an impact here but technically you are of course right. To make a proper measure change the distance view to a urban warfare - 500m- more than that you have severe overdraw because buildings, - that why there's 300/500m in KOTH mission.

#AMD RYZEN MASTER GAME MODE MODS#

You cannot use mods in a test because is a test for rendering speed with a mission, with a mod you lost more fps your test rigth now with mods is invalid.Īnd you have more fps enabling the high power comsumption profile in the o.s.

Amd ryzen master game mode